It is a very handy app for day-to-day use. They offer a great deal of client online support. You can lose money, but it will be your mistake, not theirs. Salem AM - 17 Jan Motseolapile1. I am going to start to work together with you, IQ Option. I made an account. Hope to make a great deal of money!!! Acialwip - 18 april acialwipyt. IQ Option Cool site, safe and sound. Already gained around £4, and gonna continue to make money with them.

Great interface and excellent assistance — thanks to Alex However there are risks that are unpredictable. First few months after registration I failed because did not know about it. Now I only trade euro and dollar since every day they give me the biggest exposure to risk around 3k. I have had no problems with removals. At first it was difficult for me to register my card data, however after I tried it once, it became very simple for me.

Louai N. This app is available everywhere and I like it. IQ Option, you have your own atmosphere… I think it is really important. Good luck guys…. Peter Johnson - 7 July · Paddington, London gwmseven. It is very good for new comers, recommend it you all. Bollinger bands and RSI are the best. Ezequias Rocha - 28 July ezequiasrocha. IQOption is the best platform.

Below you can see the picture where there is a comparison of the two kinds of this money tool. To learn more detailed information about this instrument function you may in the video below.

To learn more, read about the feature module manifest. Keep in mind, these APKs are larger than those optimized for a particular device configuration. However, they're easier to share with internal testers who, for example, want to test your app on multiple device configurations. For an example of how to test module installation using the --local-testing flag, see Locally test module installs.

After you generate a set of APKs, bundletool can deploy the right combination of APKs from that set to a connected device. For example, if you have a connected device running Android 5. Alternatively, if your connected device is running Android 4. If you don't want to build a set of APKs for all device configurations your app supports, you can build APKs that target only the configuration of a connected device using the --connected-device option, as shown in the following command.

bundletool can generate an APK set that targets a device configuration specified by a JSON file. To first generate a JSON file for a connected device, run the following command:. bundletool creates a JSON file for your device in the tool's directory.

You can then pass the file to bundletool to generate a set of APKs that target only the configuration described in that JSON file, as follows:. If you don't have access to the device for which you want to build a targeted APK set—for example, if you want to try your app with a device you don't have on hand—you can manually create a JSON file using the following format:.

You can then pass this JSON to the bundle extract-apks command, as described in the previous section. If you have an existing APK set and you want to extract from it a subset of APKs that target a specific device configuration, you can use the extract-apks command and specify a device specification JSON, as follows:. To measure the estimated download sizes of APKs in an APK set as they would be served compressed over the wire, use the get-size total command:.

You can modify the behavior of the get-size total command using the following flags:. Table 2. Options for the get-size total command. You can build your Android App Bundle with an Android SDK Bundle ASB dependency from the command line and sign it using jarsigner. Each app bundle module includes a Module Protocol Buffer. This file contains the list of SDKs that an app bundle module depends on. proto file. pb file to each app module's zip file with compiled code and resources.

pb file:. Certificate digest: the SHA digest of the certificate for the key used to sign the SDK's APKs. This corresponds to the certificate in the SdkMetadata. pb file in the Android SDK Archive format. Resources Package ID: the package ID that all resources in this SDK are remapped to when generating APKs for embedding the SDK into the app. This enables backward compatibility. An SDK can appear only in one module.

If multiple modules depend on the same SDK, this dependency should be deduplicated and moved to the base module. Different modules can't depend on different versions of the SDK. To generate APKs from your app bundle, follow the steps in the section about generating a set of APKs from your app bundle or the section about generating a device-specific set of APKs and provide the bundletool build-apks command with the SDKs that the app depends on.

These SDKs can be provided in SDK bundle format or SDK Archive format. You can provide the SDKs as SDK bundles by adding the --sdk-bundles flag, as follows:. You can provide the SDKs as SDK archives by adding the --sdk-archives flag, as follows:. You can use bundletool to build an ASB and test generating the files needed for installation and distribution.

You can build your ASB from the command line and sign it using jarsigner. Generate the SDK bundle's manifest and resources in proto format by following the same steps as for an app bundle. Package your SDK's compiled code and resources into a base zip file , as you would with an app module. Generate an SdkModulesConfig. json file and an SdkBundleConfig. json file, matching the format described in the Android SDK Bundle specification.

Build your ASB using the bundletool build-sdk-bundle command, as follows:. The following table describes the various flags and options you can set when using the bundletool build-sdk-bundle command in greater detail.

Table 3. Options for the bundletool build-sdk-bundle command. After you build your ASB, you can test an SDK bundle locally by generating its APKs using the bundletool build-sdk-apks command, as shown in the following code:. When bundletool generates APKs from your SDK bundle, the tool includes the APKS in a container called an APK set archive , which uses the. bundletool generates a single standalone APK from the SDK bundle that targets all device configurations.

If you want to deploy the ASB to a device, you need to also include your app's signing information, as shown in the following command:. The following table describes the various flags and options you can set when using the bundletool build-sdk-apks command in greater detail. Table 4. Options for the bundletool build-sdk-apks command. If you pass the password in clear text, you must prefix the value with pass:. For example, pass:qwerty. If the password is the first line of a file, you must prefix the value with file:.

If this flag isn't set, the keystore password is tried. If that fails, the command-line terminal prompts you for a password.

You can follow the same steps used for apps to deploy APKs to a connected device , extract device-specific APKs from an existing APK set , and measure the estimated download sizes of APKs in an APK set.

After you upload your ASB to your distribution channel, for example Google Play, the ASB is transformed into an Android SDK Archive. asar for distribution to app developers through Maven. For more details about the format, see the section about SDK Archive format specification. After you build your ASB, you can test the generation of an Android SDK Archive locally using the bundletool build-sdk-asar command, as shown in the following code:.

The following table describes the various flags and options you can set when using the bundletool build-sdk-asar command in greater detail.

Table 5. Options for the bundletool build-sdk-asar command. An SDK Bundle is a publishing format for runtime-enabled SDKs. It contains all the SDK code and resources, including the code from any libraries the SDK depends on. It doesn't include the code and resources of other runtime-enabled SDKs that the SDK depends on.

An Android SDK Bundle ASB is a signed zip file with the extension. The SDK code and resources are organized in it similarly to what you would find in an APK. An ASB also contains several configuration files that help generate the installable APKs. pb : A configuration file in proto format, containing the list of runtime-enabled SDKs that your SDK depends on.

resm : A zip file containing all the data needed to generate the APKs from the SDK. pb : A configuration file in proto format. This file contains the SDK name, version, and class name of the SDK entry point for the framework SandboxedSdkProvider. An Android SDK Archive is the distribution format of a runtime-enabled SDK on Maven. Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied?

These days, do you feel [rotate] [1] optimistic [or] [2] pessimistic that Americans of different political views can still come together and work out their differences? What is your opinion with regard to race relations in the United States today? Would you say things are [rotate 1 and 2] [1] better , [2] worse , or about the same than they were a year ago?

When it comes to racial discrimination, which do you think is the bigger problem for the country today—[rotate] [1] People seeing racial discrimination where it really does NOT exist [or] [2] People NOT seeing racial discrimination where it really DOES exist? Next, Next, would you consider yourself to be politically: [read list, rotate order top to bottom]. Generally speaking, how much interest would you say you have in politics—a great deal, a fair amount, only a little, or none?

Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California, where he holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy. He is a leading expert on public opinion and survey methodology, and has directed the PPIC Statewide Survey since He is an authority on elections, voter behavior, and political and fiscal reform, and the author of ten books and numerous publications.

Before joining PPIC, he was a professor of urban and regional planning in the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine, where he held the Johnson Chair in Civic Governance. He has conducted surveys for the Los Angeles Times , the San Francisco Chronicle , and the California Business Roundtable.

He holds a PhD in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley. Dean Bonner is associate survey director and research fellow at PPIC, where he coauthors the PPIC Statewide Survey—a large-scale public opinion project designed to develop an in-depth profile of the social, economic, and political attitudes at work in California elections and policymaking.

He has expertise in public opinion and survey research, political attitudes and participation, and voting behavior. Before joining PPIC, he taught political science at Tulane University and was a research associate at the University of New Orleans Survey Research Center. He holds a PhD and MA in political science from the University of New Orleans. Rachel Lawler is a survey analyst at the Public Policy Institute of California, where she works with the statewide survey team.

In that role, she led and contributed to a variety of quantitative and qualitative studies for both government and corporate clients. She holds an MA in American politics and foreign policy from the University College Dublin and a BA in political science from Chapman University.

Deja Thomas is a survey analyst at the Public Policy Institute of California, where she works with the statewide survey team. Prior to joining PPIC, she was a research assistant with the social and demographic trends team at the Pew Research Center.

In that role, she contributed to a variety of national quantitative and qualitative survey studies. She holds a BA in psychology from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

This survey was supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Ruben Barrales Senior Vice President, External Relations Wells Fargo. Mollyann Brodie Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Bruce E. Cain Director Bill Lane Center for the American West Stanford University. Jon Cohen Chief Research Officer and Senior Vice President, Strategic Partnerships and Business Development Momentive-AI. Joshua J. Dyck Co-Director Center for Public Opinion University of Massachusetts, Lowell.

Lisa García Bedolla Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Dean of the Graduate Division University of California, Berkeley. Russell Hancock President and CEO Joint Venture Silicon Valley. Sherry Bebitch Jeffe Professor Sol Price School of Public Policy University of Southern California. Carol S. Larson President Emeritus The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Lisa Pitney Vice President of Government Relations The Walt Disney Company. Robert K. Ross, MD President and CEO The California Endowment. Most Reverend Jaime Soto Bishop of Sacramento Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento. Helen Iris Torres CEO Hispanas Organized for Political Equality. David C. Wilson, PhD Dean and Professor Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley. Chet Hewitt, Chair President and CEO Sierra Health Foundation. Mark Baldassare President and CEO Public Policy Institute of California.

Ophelia Basgal Affiliate Terner Center for Housing Innovation University of California, Berkeley. Louise Henry Bryson Chair Emerita, Board of Trustees J. Paul Getty Trust. Sandra Celedon President and CEO Fresno Building Healthy Communities. Marisa Chun Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Steven A. Leon E. Panetta Chairman The Panetta Institute for Public Policy. Cassandra Walker Pye President Lucas Public Affairs. Gaddi H. Vasquez Retired Senior Vice President, Government Affairs Edison International Southern California Edison.

The Public Policy Institute of California is dedicated to informing and improving public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research. PPIC is a public charity. It does not take or support positions on any ballot measures or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office.

Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or of the staff, officers, advisory councils, or board of directors of the Public Policy Institute of California.

This website uses cookies to analyze site traffic and to allow users to complete forms on the site. PPIC does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise disclose personal information.

PPIC Water Policy Center. PPIC Statewide Survey. PPIC Higher Education Center. People Our Team Board of Directors Statewide Leadership Council Adjunct Fellows. Support Ways to Give Our Contributors. Table of Contents Key Findings Overall Mood Gubernatorial Election State Propositions 26, 27, and 30 Congressional Elections Democracy and the Political Divide Approval Ratings Regional Map Methodology Questions and Responses Authors and Acknowledgments PPIC Statewide Advisory Committee PPIC Board of Directors Copyright.

Key Findings Overall Mood Gubernatorial Election State Propositions 26, 27, and 30 Congressional Elections Democracy and the Political Divide Approval Ratings Regional Map Methodology Questions and Responses Authors and Acknowledgments PPIC Statewide Advisory Committee PPIC Board of Directors Copyright. Key Findings California voters have now received their mail ballots, and the November 8 general election has entered its final stage. These are among the key findings of a statewide survey on state and national issues conducted from October 14 to 23 by the Public Policy Institute of California: Many Californians have negative perceptions of their personal finances and the US economy.

Forty-seven percent say that things in California are going in the right direction, while 33 percent think things in the US are going in the right direction; partisans differ in their overall outlook. Partisans are deeply divided in their choices.

Please check back soon for future events, and sign up to receive invitations to our events and briefings. December 1, Speaker Series on California's Future — Virtual Event. November 30, Virtual Event. November 18, Annual Water Conference — In-Person and Online. We believe in the power of good information to build a brighter future for California. Help support our mission. Mark Baldassare , Dean Bonner , Rachel Lawler , and Deja Thomas. Supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F.

Miller Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation. California voters have now received their mail ballots, and the November 8 general election has entered its final stage.

Amid rising prices and economic uncertainty—as well as deep partisan divisions over social and political issues—Californians are processing a great deal of information to help them choose state constitutional officers and state legislators and to make policy decisions about state propositions. The midterm election also features a closely divided Congress, with the likelihood that a few races in California may determine which party controls the US House.

These are among the key findings of a statewide survey on state and national issues conducted from October 14 to 23 by the Public Policy Institute of California:. Today, there is a wide partisan divide: seven in ten Democrats are optimistic about the direction of the state, while 91 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of independents are pessimistic.

Californians are much more pessimistic about the direction of the country than they are about the direction of the state.

Majorities across all demographic groups and partisan groups, as well as across regions, are pessimistic about the direction of the United States. A wide partisan divide exists: most Democrats and independents say their financial situation is about the same as a year ago, while solid majorities of Republicans say they are worse off. Regionally, about half in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles say they are about the same, while half in the Central Valley say they are worse off; residents elsewhere are divided between being worse off and the same.

The shares saying they are worse off decline as educational attainment increases. Strong majorities across partisan groups feel negatively, but Republicans and independents are much more likely than Democrats to say the economy is in poor shape. Today, majorities across partisan, demographic, and regional groups say they are following news about the gubernatorial election either very or fairly closely.

In the upcoming November 8 election, there will be seven state propositions for voters. Due to time constraints, our survey only asked about three ballot measures: Propositions 26, 27, and For each, we read the proposition number, ballot, and ballot label. Two of the state ballot measures were also included in the September survey Propositions 27 and 30 , while Proposition 26 was not.

This measure would allow in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, requiring that racetracks and casinos offering sports betting make certain payments to the state to support state regulatory costs. It also allows roulette and dice games at tribal casinos and adds a new way to enforce certain state gambling laws. Fewer than half of likely voters say the outcome of each of these state propositions is very important to them.

Today, 21 percent of likely voters say the outcome of Prop 26 is very important, 31 percent say the outcome of Prop 27 is very important, and 42 percent say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important.

Today, when it comes to the importance of the outcome of Prop 26, one in four or fewer across partisan groups say it is very important to them. About one in three across partisan groups say the outcome of Prop 27 is very important to them. Fewer than half across partisan groups say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important to them.

When asked how they would vote if the election for the US House of Representatives were held today, 56 percent of likely voters say they would vote for or lean toward the Democratic candidate, while 39 percent would vote for or lean toward the Republican candidate. Democratic candidates are preferred by a point margin in Democratic-held districts, while Republican candidates are preferred by a point margin in Republican-held districts.

Abortion is another prominent issue in this election. When asked about the importance of abortion rights, 61 percent of likely voters say the issue is very important in determining their vote for Congress and another 20 percent say it is somewhat important; just 17 percent say it is not too or not at all important.

With the controlling party in Congress hanging in the balance, 51 percent of likely voters say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for Congress this year; another 29 percent are somewhat enthusiastic while 19 percent are either not too or not at all enthusiastic.

Today, Democrats and Republicans have about equal levels of enthusiasm, while independents are much less likely to be extremely or very enthusiastic. As Californians prepare to vote in the upcoming midterm election, fewer than half of adults and likely voters are satisfied with the way democracy is working in the United States—and few are very satisfied. Satisfaction was higher in our February survey when 53 percent of adults and 48 percent of likely voters were satisfied with democracy in America.

Today, half of Democrats and about four in ten independents are satisfied, compared to about one in five Republicans. Notably, four in ten Republicans are not at all satisfied. In addition to the lack of satisfaction with the way democracy is working, Californians are divided about whether Americans of different political positions can still come together and work out their differences.

Forty-nine percent are optimistic, while 46 percent are pessimistic. Today, in a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, about four in ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents are optimistic that Americans of different political views will be able to come together. Notably, in , half or more across parties, regions, and demographic groups were optimistic.

Today, about eight in ten Democrats—compared to about half of independents and about one in ten Republicans—approve of Governor Newsom. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve of how Governor Newsom is handling his job.

Approval of Congress among adults has been below 40 percent for all of after seeing a brief run above 40 percent for all of Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to approve of Congress.

Fewer than half across regions and demographic groups approve of Congress. Approval in March was at 44 percent for adults and 39 percent for likely voters. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve among women, younger adults, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos. Views are similar across education and income groups, with just fewer than half approving. Approval in March was at 41 percent for adults and 36 percent for likely voters.

Across regions, approval reaches a majority only in the San Francisco Bay Area. Across demographic groups, approval reaches a majority only among African Americans. This map highlights the five geographic regions for which we present results; these regions account for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas in gray are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

The PPIC Statewide Survey is directed by Mark Baldassare, president and CEO and survey director at the Public Policy Institute of California. Coauthors of this report include survey analyst Deja Thomas, who was the project manager for this survey; associate survey director and research fellow Dean Bonner; and survey analyst Rachel Lawler.

The Californians and Their Government survey is supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Findings in this report are based on a survey of 1, California adult residents, including 1, interviewed on cell phones and interviewed on landline telephones. The sample included respondents reached by calling back respondents who had previously completed an interview in PPIC Statewide Surveys in the last six months.

Interviews took an average of 19 minutes to complete. Interviewing took place on weekend days and weekday nights from October 14—23, Cell phone interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of cell phone numbers. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of cell phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All cell phone numbers with California area codes were eligible for selection. After a cell phone user was reached, the interviewer verified that this person was age 18 or older, a resident of California, and in a safe place to continue the survey e. Cell phone respondents were offered a small reimbursement to help defray the cost of the call.

Cell phone interviews were conducted with adults who have cell phone service only and with those who have both cell phone and landline service in the household. Landline interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers that ensured that both listed and unlisted numbers were called.

Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of landline phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California. All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection.

For both cell phones and landlines, telephone numbers were called as many as eight times. When no contact with an individual was made, calls to a number were limited to six. Also, to increase our ability to interview Asian American adults, we made up to three additional calls to phone numbers estimated by Survey Sampling International as likely to be associated with Asian American individuals. Accent on Languages, Inc. The survey sample was closely comparable to the ACS figures.

To estimate landline and cell phone service in California, Abt Associates used state-level estimates released by the National Center for Health Statistics—which used data from the National Health Interview Survey NHIS and the ACS. The estimates for California were then compared against landline and cell phone service reported in this survey.

We also used voter registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare the party registration of registered voters in our sample to party registration statewide. The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3.

This means that 95 times out of , the results will be within 3. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4.

For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section. Sampling error is only one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing. We present results for five geographic regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

We also present results for congressional districts currently held by Democrats or Republicans, based on residential zip code and party of the local US House member.

We compare the opinions of those who report they are registered Democrats, registered Republicans, and no party preference or decline-to-state or independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other parties are not large enough for separate analysis. We also analyze the responses of likely voters—so designated per their responses to survey questions about voter registration, previous election participation, intentions to vote this year, attention to election news, and current interest in politics.

The percentages presented in the report tables and in the questionnaire may not add to due to rounding. Additional details about our methodology can be found at www. pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic. October 14—23, 1, California adult residents; 1, California likely voters English, Spanish. Margin of error ±3.

pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic. For example, if you have a connected device running Android 5. For example, it might include Java-based resources that your SDK loads using the Class. About us. android app should be main. Play Feature Delivery. Quick Navigation.

Categories:

• Binary Options online
• Forex
• Forex Brokers
• Binary Options
• Forex Bitcoin